human cd26 elisa kit Search Results


cd26 activity  (Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd)
90
Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd cd26 activity
Cd26 Activity, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd26+elisa+kit/Human+DPPIV%2FCD26+ELISA+Kit/pm42330735-63-9-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd26 activity - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dpp 4 protein concentrations  (R&D Systems)
94
R&D Systems dpp 4 protein concentrations
Dpp 4 Protein Concentrations, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd26+elisa+kit/Human+DPPIV%2FCD26+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pm31796986-80-11-22
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dpp 4 protein concentrations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
human cd26 elisa kit  (R&D Systems)
92
R&D Systems human cd26 elisa kit
ARV p17-mediated release of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 <t>(DPP4)</t> expression. ( A ) Wound healing assay performed after HUVECs’ overnight stimulation with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cell migration was recorded by light microscopy 10 h after wound scratch (original magnification, 4×). The wound width was measured, and the relative wound area was calculated as the ratio of the remaining area at the 10 h time point to the 0 h starting point. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( B ) Tube formation assay performed with HUVECs co-cultivated for 48 h with Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. The pictures were taken 6 h after cell seeding (original magnification, 4×). Closed rings were counted as a parameter for quantification of tube formation. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( C ) Angiogenesis array performed with the supernatants of Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells recovered 24 h post-nucleofection. Relative pixel intensity was calculated using ImageJ software and expressed as the mean of duplicate dots. Values are representative of one experiment out of two with similar results. ( D ) Analysis of DPP4 gene expression performed using quantitative real-time PCR in Mock- and ARV p17-nucleofected cells. Analysis of real-time PCR data were performed with the 2 -DDCt method using relative quantitation study software. Quantification of DPP4 mRNA was normalized according to the internal β-actin control. Values represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( E ) soluble (s) DPP4 levels in supernatants of HUVECs stimulated with GST-ARV p17 for 48 h were quantified with human sDPP4 <t>ELISA.</t> Supernatant from GST stimulated cells was used as a negative control. Bar graph displays the concentration of DPP4 determined by absorbance quantification. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001.
Human Cd26 Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd26+elisa+kit/Human+DPPIV%2FCD26+ELISA+Kit+(Colorimetric)/pmc07911508-85-13-17
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human cd26 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
immunosorbent assay elisa  (R&D Systems)
94
R&D Systems immunosorbent assay elisa
ARV p17-mediated release of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 <t>(DPP4)</t> expression. ( A ) Wound healing assay performed after HUVECs’ overnight stimulation with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cell migration was recorded by light microscopy 10 h after wound scratch (original magnification, 4×). The wound width was measured, and the relative wound area was calculated as the ratio of the remaining area at the 10 h time point to the 0 h starting point. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( B ) Tube formation assay performed with HUVECs co-cultivated for 48 h with Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. The pictures were taken 6 h after cell seeding (original magnification, 4×). Closed rings were counted as a parameter for quantification of tube formation. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( C ) Angiogenesis array performed with the supernatants of Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells recovered 24 h post-nucleofection. Relative pixel intensity was calculated using ImageJ software and expressed as the mean of duplicate dots. Values are representative of one experiment out of two with similar results. ( D ) Analysis of DPP4 gene expression performed using quantitative real-time PCR in Mock- and ARV p17-nucleofected cells. Analysis of real-time PCR data were performed with the 2 -DDCt method using relative quantitation study software. Quantification of DPP4 mRNA was normalized according to the internal β-actin control. Values represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( E ) soluble (s) DPP4 levels in supernatants of HUVECs stimulated with GST-ARV p17 for 48 h were quantified with human sDPP4 <t>ELISA.</t> Supernatant from GST stimulated cells was used as a negative control. Bar graph displays the concentration of DPP4 determined by absorbance quantification. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001.
Immunosorbent Assay Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd26+elisa+kit/Human+DPPIV%2FCD26+Quantikine+ELISA+Kit/pm37350750-61-20-24
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
immunosorbent assay elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
human cd26 dpp4 elisa kit  (Boster Bio)
90
Boster Bio human cd26 dpp4 elisa kit
ARV p17-mediated release of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 <t>(DPP4)</t> expression. ( A ) Wound healing assay performed after HUVECs’ overnight stimulation with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cell migration was recorded by light microscopy 10 h after wound scratch (original magnification, 4×). The wound width was measured, and the relative wound area was calculated as the ratio of the remaining area at the 10 h time point to the 0 h starting point. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( B ) Tube formation assay performed with HUVECs co-cultivated for 48 h with Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. The pictures were taken 6 h after cell seeding (original magnification, 4×). Closed rings were counted as a parameter for quantification of tube formation. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( C ) Angiogenesis array performed with the supernatants of Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells recovered 24 h post-nucleofection. Relative pixel intensity was calculated using ImageJ software and expressed as the mean of duplicate dots. Values are representative of one experiment out of two with similar results. ( D ) Analysis of DPP4 gene expression performed using quantitative real-time PCR in Mock- and ARV p17-nucleofected cells. Analysis of real-time PCR data were performed with the 2 -DDCt method using relative quantitation study software. Quantification of DPP4 mRNA was normalized according to the internal β-actin control. Values represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( E ) soluble (s) DPP4 levels in supernatants of HUVECs stimulated with GST-ARV p17 for 48 h were quantified with human sDPP4 <t>ELISA.</t> Supernatant from GST stimulated cells was used as a negative control. Bar graph displays the concentration of DPP4 determined by absorbance quantification. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001.
Human Cd26 Dpp4 Elisa Kit, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+cd26+elisa+kit/Human+CD26%2FDPP4+ELISA+Kit+PicoKine/pmc04608357-81-11-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human cd26 dpp4 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
elisa kit cd26 human  (G Biosciences)
N/A
An ELISA kit for the detection of CD26 Human This uses Sandwich ELISA Double Antibody and has a sensitivity of 0 188ng ml
   Buy from Supplier
human cd26 dpp4 elisa kit  (OriGene)
N/A
Human CD26 DPP4 ELISA Kit
   Buy from Supplier
cd26 human elisa kit  (Thermo Fisher)
N/A
The Human CD26 (DPP4) ELISA research-use-only kit is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay designed for the quantitation and detection of CD26 (DPP4) in samples (see sample types indicated) using a microplate reader. The assay will recognize
   Buy from Supplier
human dppiv cd26 elisa kit colorimetric  (Novus Biologicals)
N/A
The Human DPPIV CD26 ELISA Kit Colorimetric from Novus Biologicals is a ELISA Kit Colorimetric that quantifies human DPPIV CD26 in human cell culture supernatant serum
   Buy from Supplier
human cd26/dpp4 picokine quick elisa kit  (Boster Bio)
N/A
Human CD26/DPP4 PicoKine® Quick ELISA Kit (90 minutes, 96 Tests). Quantitate Human CD26/DPP4 in cell culture supernatants, serum, plasma (heparin, EDTA), saliva and urine. Sensitivity: 10 pg/ml. The brand Picokine indicates this is a premium
   Buy from Supplier
human cd26 - dpp4 elisa kit  (Rockland Immunochemicals)
N/A
Human CD26/DPP4 AccuSignal ELISA Kit - KOA0401
   Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


ARV p17-mediated release of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP4) expression. ( A ) Wound healing assay performed after HUVECs’ overnight stimulation with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cell migration was recorded by light microscopy 10 h after wound scratch (original magnification, 4×). The wound width was measured, and the relative wound area was calculated as the ratio of the remaining area at the 10 h time point to the 0 h starting point. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( B ) Tube formation assay performed with HUVECs co-cultivated for 48 h with Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. The pictures were taken 6 h after cell seeding (original magnification, 4×). Closed rings were counted as a parameter for quantification of tube formation. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( C ) Angiogenesis array performed with the supernatants of Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells recovered 24 h post-nucleofection. Relative pixel intensity was calculated using ImageJ software and expressed as the mean of duplicate dots. Values are representative of one experiment out of two with similar results. ( D ) Analysis of DPP4 gene expression performed using quantitative real-time PCR in Mock- and ARV p17-nucleofected cells. Analysis of real-time PCR data were performed with the 2 -DDCt method using relative quantitation study software. Quantification of DPP4 mRNA was normalized according to the internal β-actin control. Values represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( E ) soluble (s) DPP4 levels in supernatants of HUVECs stimulated with GST-ARV p17 for 48 h were quantified with human sDPP4 ELISA. Supernatant from GST stimulated cells was used as a negative control. Bar graph displays the concentration of DPP4 determined by absorbance quantification. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001.

Journal: Cells

Article Title: Avian Reovirus P17 Suppresses Angiogenesis by Promoting DPP4 Secretion

doi: 10.3390/cells10020259

Figure Lengend Snippet: ARV p17-mediated release of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP4) expression. ( A ) Wound healing assay performed after HUVECs’ overnight stimulation with conditioned medium from Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. Confluent cell monolayers were scratched using a 200 μL pipette tip and cell migration was recorded by light microscopy 10 h after wound scratch (original magnification, 4×). The wound width was measured, and the relative wound area was calculated as the ratio of the remaining area at the 10 h time point to the 0 h starting point. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( B ) Tube formation assay performed with HUVECs co-cultivated for 48 h with Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected HUVEC cells. The pictures were taken 6 h after cell seeding (original magnification, 4×). Closed rings were counted as a parameter for quantification of tube formation. Pictures are representative of one out of two independent experiments with similar results. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( C ) Angiogenesis array performed with the supernatants of Mock- or ARV p17-nucleofected cells recovered 24 h post-nucleofection. Relative pixel intensity was calculated using ImageJ software and expressed as the mean of duplicate dots. Values are representative of one experiment out of two with similar results. ( D ) Analysis of DPP4 gene expression performed using quantitative real-time PCR in Mock- and ARV p17-nucleofected cells. Analysis of real-time PCR data were performed with the 2 -DDCt method using relative quantitation study software. Quantification of DPP4 mRNA was normalized according to the internal β-actin control. Values represent the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of two with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001. ( E ) soluble (s) DPP4 levels in supernatants of HUVECs stimulated with GST-ARV p17 for 48 h were quantified with human sDPP4 ELISA. Supernatant from GST stimulated cells was used as a negative control. Bar graph displays the concentration of DPP4 determined by absorbance quantification. Values are the mean ± SD of one representative experiment out of three independent experiments with similar results, performed in triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. *** p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The release of DPP4 in the concentrated conditioned medium was evaluated using a human CD26 ELISA Kit (R&D systems) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Techniques: Expressing, Wound Healing Assay, Transferring, Migration, Light Microscopy, Tube Formation Assay, Software, Gene Expression, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitation Assay, Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Negative Control, Concentration Assay